# uphiago/recon-skills

Recon & pentest skill pack. CORS, XSS, SQLi, SSRF, RCE, WordPress, MCP, cloud, subdomain takeover, and more. Field-tested. MIT. Full write-up at hiago.sh

Repository: https://github.com/uphiago/recon-skills
Canonical: https://ross.abutalabs.com/products/recon-skills
Homepage: https://hiago.sh
Language: Python
License: MIT
License Family: permissive
Topics: bug-bounty, cloud-security, firebase-hacking, hermes-agent, jwt-attacks, offensive-security, penetration-testing, reconnaissance, red-team, security-automation, ssrf, subdomain-enumeration, supabase, wordpress-security, cors-exploitation
Last push: 2026-08-24T13:22:07+00:00

## Health v2 (maintenance only)
Score: 58/100 (v2, computed 2026-09-03T02:20:16.233290+00:00)
- activity 99, release rhythm 35, longevity 5
- inputs: {"age_days": 70, "days_push": 9, "days_rel": null, "gap_med": null, "n_releases_24m": 0}
- flags: no_releases, young
- formula: round(0.45*activity + 0.35*rhythm + 0.20*longevity); archived -> min(score, 10)

## Adoption (not part of the score)
Stars 1199, forks 209 (observed 2026-08-28T04:03:57.817140+00:00)

## What it is
A curated pack of Markdown skill files documenting reconnaissance and penetration-testing procedures for web apps, APIs, authentication, cloud, and infrastructure. It serves as a reference playbook collection for authorized security testing and bug bounty work rather than an executable tool.

## Use cases
- learn web application penetration testing methodology
- find subdomain takeover and SSRF testing playbooks
- structure a bug bounty recon workflow
- reference OAuth and JWT attack techniques
- plan an external attack-surface assessment
- validate CORS, XSS, and SQLi vulnerabilities during engagements

## When to choose
- you need field-tested step-by-step pentest and recon procedures
- you run authorized bug bounty or red team engagements and want a methodology reference
- you want documented prerequisites, pitfalls, and verification criteria per technique

## When to avoid
- you expect runnable scanning or exploitation tooling - this is documentation, not a scanner
- you lack authorization to test the target systems
- you need automated continuous security monitoring

## Facets
- artifact type: learning-resource
- maturity: active
- function: penetration-testing, security, osint, vulnerability-scanning, developer-tools
- domain: security, penetration-testing, osint, developer-tools
- platform: cli, python
- tags: bug-bounty, red-team, reconnaissance, skill-pack, markdown-playbooks, offensive-security, subdomain-enumeration, ssrf, wordpress-security, jwt-attacks, linux

## Member repositories
- uphiago/recon-skills (main) score 58

## Provenance
- Observed fields: from GitHub, fetched 2026-08-28T04:03:57.817140+00:00.
- Health v2: computed from the inputs above; adoption is never an input.
- Inferred fields (summary, facets, guidance): AI-extracted, prompt v1, taxonomy v1, on 2026-08-30T06:21:07.120474+00:00, confidence not recorded.
  - readme: https://github.com/uphiago/recon-skills (fetched 2026-08-28T04:03:57.817140+00:00, sha 1fd95e652db3)
  - homepage: https://hiago.sh (fetched 2026-08-29T12:28:34.544176+00:00, sha 5854e05a263e)
- Data as of 2026-08-30T08:39:29.467469+00:00.
