# all-contributors/allcontributors.org

✨ The all-contributors bot website and documentation. Recognize all contributors, not just the ones who push code ✨

Repository: https://github.com/all-contributors/allcontributors.org
Canonical: https://ross.abutalabs.com/products/allcontributorsorg
Homepage: https://allcontributors.org/
Language: MDX
License: MIT
License Family: permissive
Topics: contributors, all-contributors, opensource, opensource-management, open-source-tooling, acknowledgements, recognition
Last push: 2026-08-21T09:50:34+00:00

## Health v2 (maintenance only)
Score: 67/100 (v2, computed 2026-09-02T17:46:02.011165+00:00)
- activity 98, release rhythm 8, longevity 100
- inputs: {"age_days": 3839, "days_push": 12, "days_rel": null, "gap_med": null, "n_releases_24m": 0}
- flags: none
- formula: round(0.45*activity + 0.35*rhythm + 0.20*longevity); archived -> min(score, 10)

## Adoption (not part of the score)
Stars 8093, forks 1727 (observed 2026-08-28T04:10:12.665851+00:00)

## What it is
The website and documentation for the All Contributors specification and GitHub bot, which recognizes all types of contributions to open-source projects, not just code. It hosts the specification, emoji key reference, and bot usage docs on allcontributors.org.

## Use cases
- recognize non-code contributors in my project README
- add an all-contributors table to my repository
- automate contributor acknowledgements with a GitHub bot
- understand the all-contributors specification and emoji key
- document different contribution types like docs, design, and review
- set up the all-contributors bot for my open-source project

## When to choose
- you want to acknowledge every kind of contribution (docs, design, mentoring, review) in an open-source project
- you need the official spec, emoji key, or bot documentation for all-contributors
- you want to foster community recognition beyond code commits

## When to avoid
- you need CI tooling or code-quality automation rather than contributor recognition
- you want a standalone contributor analytics dashboard rather than a README-based spec
- you are looking for the bot implementation itself, which lives in a separate repository

## Facets
- artifact type: learning-resource
- maturity: active
- function: documentation, developer-tools
- domain: developer-tools, documentation
- platform: -
- tags: all-contributors, contributor-recognition, open-source-governance, documentation-site, docusaurus, github-bot, acknowledgements, open-source, community, web-server, nodejs

## Member repositories
- all-contributors/allcontributors.org (main) score 67

## Provenance
- Observed fields: from GitHub, fetched 2026-08-28T04:10:12.665851+00:00.
- Health v2: computed from the inputs above; adoption is never an input.
- Inferred fields (summary, facets, guidance): AI-extracted, prompt v1, taxonomy v1, on 2026-08-29T17:30:43.264731+00:00, confidence not recorded.
  - readme: https://github.com/all-contributors/allcontributors.org (fetched 2026-08-28T04:10:12.665851+00:00, sha b7b4abe662be)
  - homepage: https://allcontributors.org/ (fetched 2026-08-29T08:29:07.422479+00:00, sha f40c9d61baed)
- Data as of 2026-08-30T08:39:29.467469+00:00.